Gear Score Card
Date: July 2026
Overall Rating
9.3
out of 10.0
Weight
148g (women's medium)
Available Sizes
Women's: XS–XL
At 148g in a women's medium, the Coburn 5" Short is the lightest garment in the women's evaluation — 27% below the category average of 202g.
Best-in-test comfort and fit for women's trail use. Women's-specific patterning delivers a secure, flattering fit without restricting movement on technical terrain.
Four-way stretch with gusseted crotch provides excellent range of motion. Women's-specific articulation excels on steep ascents and technical trail.
Fast-dry nylon-spandex blend wicks moisture efficiently during high-output hiking. Maintains comfort across a range of trail conditions.
Well-configured pocket system for women's trail use. Secure hand pockets and a zippered back pocket provide practical storage without bulk.
Stio nylon-spandex construction offers solid durability for sustained trail use. Reinforced stress points hold up well under regular use.
Lightweight construction delivers good airflow for warm-weather hiking. Fast-dry fabric manages heat buildup during sustained aerobic output.
Premium price point justified by best-in-class weight and women's-specific performance for serious trail athletes.
The Stio Women's Coburn 5" Short earns The Collective's Choice for women's hiking shorts in July 2026. At 148 grams — the lightest short in the women's evaluation — it delivers best-in-category weight alongside the highest comfort and fit score evaluated. Women's-specific patterning, four-way stretch, and a gusseted crotch provide exceptional mobility on technical terrain. The fast-dry nylon-spandex construction manages moisture efficiently for high-output hiking. For women who demand a lightweight, performance-focused short with a precise fit, the Coburn 5" Short is the definitive choice.
The Feather & Arrow Collective | Independent Evaluation. Intelligent Analysis.
Data Sources: All specifications, weights, and performance data are sourced exclusively from manufacturer published specifications, technical documentation, and peer-reviewed materials science research. No independent physical testing was conducted. Scores reflect comparative analysis of manufacturer data relative to category averages.