Gear Score Card
Date: July 2026
Overall Rating
8.5
out of 10.0
Weight
165g (women's medium)
Available Sizes
Women's: XS–3XL
At 165g in a women's medium, the Baleaf High Rise Short is 18% below the category average of 202g — second-lightest in the women's evaluation.
Best-in-test value in the women's evaluation by a significant margin. Delivers UPF 50+ protection, four-way stretch, and high-rise fit at a fraction of premium competitors.
Four-way stretch construction provides excellent range of motion for hiking and fitness use. High-rise waistband delivers secure, stay-put fit during active movement.
UPF 50+ construction provides strong UV protection for exposed trail conditions. High-rise coverage adds additional sun protection at the waist.
High-rise waistband provides a secure, flattering fit preferred by many women hikers. Wide elastic waistband stays in place during sustained activity.
Quick-dry polyester-spandex blend manages moisture adequately for moderate-output hiking. Fast-dry performance is good for the price point.
Polyester-spandex construction is less durable than nylon alternatives under sustained abrasion. Well-suited for trail hiking; less ideal for technical scrambling.
Basic pocket configuration. Side pockets provide adequate storage for essentials; fewer secure options than premium competitors.
The Baleaf Stretchy UPF 50 High Rise Short delivers best-in-test value in the women's evaluation by a significant margin. UPF 50+ protection, four-way stretch, and a high-rise fit are delivered at a price point well below premium competitors. At 165 grams, it ranks second-lightest in the women's evaluation. The high-rise waistband provides a secure, stay-put fit preferred by many women hikers during sustained activity. For women who want strong performance at an accessible price point, the Baleaf High Rise Short is the standout value choice.
The Feather & Arrow Collective | Independent Evaluation. Intelligent Analysis.
Data Sources: All specifications, weights, and performance data are sourced exclusively from manufacturer published specifications, technical documentation, and peer-reviewed materials science research. No independent physical testing was conducted. Scores reflect comparative analysis of manufacturer data relative to category averages.